Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prodibio

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prodibio

    <a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6630356#post6630356 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by TryTheChi
    I have been asked via PM if I could do a summary of Iwan's methods by pulling together what we have learned from this thread so far. Clearly his tank is such an inspiration to us. So what follows is my understanding of his approach, a step by step guide for english speakers on how much of what is needed, reference to manufacturers recommendations and a little from my own experience.

    The additives Iwan is using are in two categories:

    Probiotic (biotechnology based on bacterial interactions with disovled componds) method - (and an alternative approach to the Zeo Basic 4):

    1. Prodibio Bio Digest - Bacteria strains to take No3 and PO4 to undetectable levels; - Dosed every 2 weeks - 1 ampule per 1000lts;

    2. Prodibio Bio TIPM (or Trace) - bacteria food. Dosed every 2 weeks - 1 ampule per 200ltrs;

    3. Zeo Start 2: Carbon bacteria food: Dosed daily 1ml per 100ltrs. (One of the Zeo basic 4);

    Coral food and trace elements:

    4. Prodibio Reef Booster - Omega 3, Amino Acids, and trace elements. Dosed weekly at 1 ampule per 400ltrs;

    5. Zeo Coral Vitaliser (CV)- SPS food dosed daily after lights out 1-3 drops per 100l (depending on stocking levels);

    6. Zeo Amino Acid High Concentrat (AAHC): Dosed daily after lights out 1-3 drops per 1 100 ltrs - Coral growth and coloration enhancer;

    7. Zeo Potassium Iodine Flouride (PIF) : Dosed twise a week anytime at 1 drop per 100ltrs;

    Prodibio is not available in the UK or US (although Floridot is looking into being the US importer) and the cheapest I have found it is from a French supplier who ships to the UK and US:

    http://www.theaquaticparadise.com/pr...45a7e294c5bb25

    Zeo products are available in the UK and US from sponcers on the Zeo site.

    When calculating how much you need of each - the following tips maybe helpfull.

    1. 100lts = 25 USg
    2. 3 drops from a Zeo pipette = 0.1 ml
    3. Estimate net system water volume.

    For example if your net water volume is 600ltrs (150 usg) the following amounts will be needed for 1 year 2 months supply based arround the 30 vials in the core product - Prodibio BioDigest:
    (- Quater the amounts below if you want to trail the approach for 3 months.
    - Double the amounts below if you are lucky enough to have a 1200ltr reef.
    - Half the amounts below if you have a 1200ltr reefand want to trail it for 3 months.
    - Etc etc)

    1. BioDigests: 30 vials;
    2. BioTIPM (or Bio Trace): 90 vials;
    3. ZeoStart 2: 10 x 500ml bottles;

    4. Prodibio Reef Booster: 60 vials (this is underdoing on a 600l - but seems OK so far on my reef);
    5. Zeo CV: 100mls (Based on minimuml dosage of 1 drop per 100ltrs)(this product has a shelf life and should be kept in the fridge.);
    6. Zeo AAHC: 100mls, as for CV;
    7. Zeo PIF: 50 mls;

    The above is what is required to follow Iwans dosage system and respectve manufactureres recommendations. In addition Iwan also uses live Phytoplancton (DT):

    Other points that may help:

    1. Bacteria Substrate: The probiotic approachs ( Prodibio and Zeo Basic 4) results in bio films that require substrates to attach themselves to. For Zeo Basic 4 it is the Zeolith rocks and LR, - in Iwans approach it is LR and 4 inch MSB in the tank (he has no sump). In my tank it is LR and MSB in the sump (tank is BB).;

    2. Ozone and UV will kill the bacteria - and are incompatible with a probiotic method;

    3. Regular water changes are used to replenish trace elements;

    4.1 Calcium, Alkalinity and PH: In common with all other systems - CA/DKH/MG/PH need to be maintained at NSW levels - . I have found that Prodibio is effective at 10.2 dkh for those who are concerned about PH dips. Iwan and Zeo run thier DKH at 8.

    4.2 Kalkwasser is not required, with the use of aragonite MSB and a CA reactor. As the tank matures and CA demand increases, a CA reactor will have to run at full pelt, be exchanged for a larger one or as Iwan does - use the balling method to supplement the CA reactor.

    4.3 Given the strong acidification that will result from hyper active bacteria, I would recommend that a DSB or MSB of aragonite is used in the tank or sump to buffer the water and maintain PH at 8.1 just before lights go on (point of highest acidification in the daily cycle. My sump MSB base area is 20% of the tank base area and seems to work fine;


    5. Protein skimming is always helpfull. I have found that taking the skimmer off for 3 weeks to test the effect on phyto and zoo plancton populations did not result in a rise of NO3 or PO4. I took off a super agressive detlec skimmer, but have since put on a more plancton friendly Tunze skimmer. NO3 and PO4 remain undetectable. Skimmate is lightening gradually the longer Prodio is used;

    6. Algae refugium: IME the effect on algae refugium with Prodibio is similar to the reported effect with Zeo BAsic 4. During the first 4 weeks the chateo continued to grow well, then stagnated and at week 6 begab to die due to NO3 PO4 starvation - so keep an eye out for that.

    7. Activated carbon: I have found that 24/7 use of activated carbon (rowacarbon) through a Tunze quick change filter (ie powered) has not resulted in STN or RTN. This is switched of for 30 mins after any dosage). However - I may not be experiencing the full effect of the coral food and tace element suppliments and will change carbon use to 24/7 passive use;

    8. Fluidised Rowaphos: This media is at the very last stage in the sump - and the small amount that I fluidise has not been depleted. This may indicate that it is no longer needed. Iwan no longer uses it;

    9 Lighting: There is no doubt in Germany that T5 lighting with individual parabolic reflectors alternating between actinic and white bulbs in a 50/50 ration is highly effective for SPS. Full side to side and front to back coverage is required. This will have a radiant heat effect and raise tank water temperatures. Running fans to cool T5 bulbs will control tank water temperature and increase T5 light output.

    It allows coral placement across the full length and width of the tank to a depth of 80cm (depending on SPS species) from the tubes. Iwan changes his approx every 9 months - dannano (RC TOTM March 05 hasnt changes his in over 2 years). B Mohr described a slowing of SPS growth after 9 months.

    10. SPS Coloration: None of the above can turn a genetically brown sps into any other colour. This approach will make the best of the color in the coral DNA.

    11. Risks:

    An attractive feature of the prodibio approach has been no observed risk of RTN due to rapid changes in clinical nitrogen cycle parameters.

    I suggest you can be confident to use the Prodibio elements from day 1, along with Zeo CV and AAHC (these 2 start at 1 drop per 100lts per day and titrate the dope upwards in 2 weekly intervals)

    There are contra indications with ZeoStart2 and PIF that are described in the Zeo Guide V1.01.

    Finally - I hope this is a helpful sumarry of what I have learned to date - and many many thanks to Iwan for introducing the english speaking world to this approach, and I would be very grateful if Iwan would wish to add anything to help us along further.

    HTH

    Simon (trythechi)
    Anyone know more about this stuff?
    Josh
    System: 430ltr SPS ZEOvit system, Balling Method (Growtech), BubbleKing200, Profilux with LAN and Salinity
    Lighting: Dimmbar 54w T5: D&D and KZ mixture.
    Flow: Tunze 6060, Iwaki MX70 CL + penductors
    BlauRiff

    "I love the smell of Napalm in the morning"

  • #2
    Found this:

    http://www.prodibio.fr/anglais/accueil.htm
    Josh
    System: 430ltr SPS ZEOvit system, Balling Method (Growtech), BubbleKing200, Profilux with LAN and Salinity
    Lighting: Dimmbar 54w T5: D&D and KZ mixture.
    Flow: Tunze 6060, Iwaki MX70 CL + penductors
    BlauRiff

    "I love the smell of Napalm in the morning"

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Josh, my impression of Prodibio & other copycat products[Ultravit, etc] is one of trying to hitch a ride on the coat-tails of the ZEOvit success method but these products will fall far short of the results that ZEOvit achieves without the special zeolites & their specific carbon sources. Iwan's results are a result of his aquarist's skills, hours of weekly husbandry, & the zeo-components & supplements that he uses. Do not be surprised to see the results of other aquarists emulating Iwan's method to be lacking, as others in Europe have tried these products with a dubious outcome. Bob
      "There might be something to this ZEOvit"

      Comment


      • #4
        Crikey Thanks Bob.
        Josh
        System: 430ltr SPS ZEOvit system, Balling Method (Growtech), BubbleKing200, Profilux with LAN and Salinity
        Lighting: Dimmbar 54w T5: D&D and KZ mixture.
        Flow: Tunze 6060, Iwaki MX70 CL + penductors
        BlauRiff

        "I love the smell of Napalm in the morning"

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Aged Salt
          Hi Josh, my impression of Prodibio & other copycat products[Ultravit, etc] is one of trying to hitch a ride on the coat-tails of the ZEOvit success method but these products will fall far short of the results that ZEOvit achieves without the special zeolites & their specific carbon sources. Iwan's results are a result of his aquarist's skills, hours of weekly husbandry, & the zeo-components & supplements that he uses. Do not be surprised to see the results of other aquarists emulating Iwan's method to be lacking, as others in Europe have tried these products with a dubious outcome. Bob
          Hi Bob

          Interesting points and comments, and in the interests of furthering my understanding - I would like to test out some of your comments, in the nicest possible way

          1 - Lets get the 'diligent and inteligent aquarist requirements' agreed and out of the way: Iwan sounds like and no doubt is as you describe him. Others who try to emulate his approach without a wider range a knowledge to drawn on, or who are a little slack may have hit or miss results. However I'v read on other posts here that this is also your view of the Zeovit approach. Some can't keep reef tank, some cant keep zeo reef tanks. At the most basic level some dont have access to or can affort the alpha gene pool of the world class tanks.

          2 - Iwan is using Zeo Start2 plus some of the non zeo dependant additives. This leaves the zeo rocks and bac and bac food ( 3 of the basic 4) as the key variation in methadology from the current Zeo 'state of the art'. Have I understood that right?

          3- Without information on the content of the Zeo basic 2 that Iwan is not using - neither you (well I shouldnt make assumptions with you Bob sorry ), I or a microbiologist can compare the features of the 2 Zeo additives and Prodi Bio Digest or Trace. This would require specislist lab investigation to identify the content then appropriate expertese to interpret the significance of any difference between the 2 product profiles. Can you reference these for me please, preferable in peer reviewed journals?

          4 - Zeoliths are then the remaining variable we need to deal with, and understand to what extent they adds value in the reef keeping context. Clearly there is huge evidence and an industry based on the decontamination effects of zeolites - both natural and lab formed. (The example I use to try to keep people's minds open to zeolites is thier use in the decontamination of the chernobyle site).

          However, please do correct me if I'm wrong, the use of the mixture of 4 zeolites branded as Zeoliths in the Zeo method are 2 fold:
          a) to adsorb NH3 much earlier in the nitrification cycle - and alongside skimming;
          b) act as a substrate for biofilm which has 2 sub functions
          i. take out any residual NO2/3 PO4.
          ii. provide nurtients delivered by free floating bacteria to corals via the daily pumping action of the reactor.

          If my understanding is correct:
          In relation to a) - what harm is here in letting the bac do the work? Clearly the Prodibio bac does this work. To what extent is Prodibio BioDigest less advantagous that Zeo bac colonising zeolites? What is the mechanism in the greater Zeo advantage?

          In relation to b) i. there is no difference far as I can see;
          In relation to b) ii. this could be the key difference between the 2 approaches - but to what extent is this provable? Again if it has been any references would be appreciated.

          5. Please can you provide the links to the sources in Europe which report a dubious outcome from prodibio products.

          End of nicest possible probe

          More generally, I have observed that there is a fair degree of interest in the full Zeo method, including me, but there is also a significant concern about the risks involved. To turn a decent tank into a stunning tank is what we all aspire to - however each individual has to go through thier own risk/benefit analysis, and there is a enough concern out there that Zeo Basic 4 could hurt - which is why I think people have been so interested in a less risky alternative ( along with the reduced dosing regime and costs).

          The Zeo basic 4 has competition, which we all know to be good. It raises the game - and I hope you can enlighten me as per the above.

          My personal game plan is go with the original post in this thread for a year, and then switch to ZB4 if I am enlightened as to how it will take the reef to even higher levels.

          Thanks in advance for your reply Bob, and I hope you take the enquiring in the positive spirit it is intended -

          We dont want no Prodi ZB4 wars breakin out

          Cheers

          Simon

          Comment


          • #6
            Greetings All!

            Originally posted by trythechi
            We dont want no Prodi ZB4 wars breakin out
            ROTFL ... thanks! Can't speak for anyone but myself ... but I love focused inquiry, sans attitude, particularly in ZEOville.

            Originally posted by trythechi
            Iwan is using Zeo Start2 plus some of the non zeo dependant additives. This leaves the zeo rocks and bac and bac food ( 3 of the basic 4) as the key variation in methadology from the current Zeo 'state of the art'. Have I understood that right?
            Not quite ... Iwan's awesome system includes a phosphate absorber (ROWAPhos), and a silicate absorber (unspecified). Source Link: Iwan's Technical Info Page (German language reference to "phosphatabsorber" and "silikatabsorber").

            I point this out because I appreciate Simon's focus on the bacteria/biofilm, along with their respective growth media requirements, as critical issues for comparison. It seems to me that the ZEOvit system's bacterial guild is demonstrating a phosphate sequestration and export behavior (... issues of zeoreactors as exporter and nutrient generator aside, for the moment ...) that the prodibio's heterotrophs/nitrifiers/denitrifiers guild is not demonstrating.

            This strikes me as a significant ecological and functional difference.

            The emergent bacterioplankton filtration configurations/products that Mr. Pohl appears to have set in motion in the worldwide marine ornamental industry (... although I think it's reasonable to assert that mariculture/aquaculture folks are entitled to "first credit" for the actual application of such bacterioplankton configurations ...) is a fascinating progression in the hobby. I suspect we'll be having more of these discussions as future "contenders" emerge.


            JMO ... HTH
            "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
            Hunter S. Thompson

            Comment


            • #7
              Thnx. for your reply, Simon, on your theoretical comparisons. If you wish to do the laboratory anaylsis of the different products, please do so, & post the laboratory's results here. To me the "proof is in the pudding" in that I like to see practical results. It does seem interesting to me that your approach uses mixed products, namely ZeoStart2, PIF, AAHC & C-V with bio-bacteria, bio-food, & RowaPhos's iron-oxide P04-remover. I agree not all zeo-users will automatically have success with their reefs as there can be no control over system inadequaties[parameter swings, flow, lighting, etc.], but that can occur with whatever method one uses. While there are a multitude of beautiful, colorful ZEOvit reefs pictured across many reef forums, I've only seen one reef using the mixed method.

              Simon, have you seen any other reefs, besides Iwan's, using straight bio-products or even mixed products? Thnx. Bob
              "There might be something to this ZEOvit"

              Comment


              • #8
                Greetings All !


                Originally posted by trythechi
                However, please do correct me if I'm wrong, the use of the mixture of 4 zeolites branded as Zeoliths in the Zeo method are 2 fold:
                a) ....
                b) act as a substrate for biofilm which has 2 sub functions
                i. take out any residual NO2/3 PO4.
                ii. provide nurtients delivered by free floating bacteria to corals via the daily pumping action of the reactor.
                ...
                in relation to b)i ...
                In relation to b) ii. this could be the key difference between the 2 approaches - but to what extent is this provable?
                "Proof" is an elusive quality in reefkeeping cyberspace, isn't it? ...

                I have nothing to offer that I would consider to be "proof", but I do have another "tangent" to suggest. Perhaps the behavior of the two guilds under conditions of various ratios of live rock to system volume offers some additional angles for contrast and comparison ... perhaps. Apologies up front for introducing another variable into the discussion ... parsimony is a good concept.

                This is the link to a ZeoThread which describes my first ZEOvit system (Mesocosm's ZEOvit Frag System; mesocosm; 3.22.2005). This was an ~64 G system established in January, 2005. It's original live rock content was 27 lbs (Fiji base). After a few months, I reduced the LR content to 5 lbs. (Post #21; 5.18.2005). After this reduction in LR, the system operated for another 5 months before being "torn down". Throughout it's 10 month lifespan, the system never exhibited measurable NH3, NO2, or NO3. This despite being a "receiving" tank for newly imported wild SPS, LPS, and Zoanthid colonies ... with all the usual decaying organic matter which accompanies such specimens.

                Granted that there's significant variance in requirements/recommendations regarding live rock vs. system volume ... to say nothing of the issue of the "quality" of the LR. Having noted that, if we presume a 1:1 ratio as a "standard" recommendation/requirement (... I'm open to alternative ratio suggestions ...), then this system maintained stable, unmeasurable nitrogen-compound water quality utilizing ZEOvit system components despite having less than 15% (5/49) of the "typical" LR requirement.

                Are prodibio inoculants and nutrients able to perform similarly with "less than the usual" live rock compliment? If so, then I've added nothing to the discussion ... apologies. If not, then perhaps we've moved towards identifying a "key difference."

                Curious as to the throughts and experiences of others ... TIA!

                JMO ... HTH
                "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
                Hunter S. Thompson

                Comment


                • #9
                  as others in Europe have tried these products with a dubious outcome. Bob
                  Do you have links of these dubious outcomes???

                  i am using prodibio and even overdosed and have not had any problems.

                  Iwan's results are a result of his aquarist's skills,
                  You could say that for most zeo tanks as well as some are good and some are average, it comes down to the skill level, just because you use zeovit does not mean you will have a nice tank. Thats goes for all products.

                  my impression of Prodibio & other copycat products[Ultravit, etc] is one of trying to hitch a ride on the coat-tails of the ZEOvit success
                  How is prodibio a copy of zeovit??
                  zeovit is made up of bacteria, carbon source, zeolite, all of these products have been around way before zeovit .
                  zeolite has been used in the aquaculture industrie for many years.


                  here is a link of different filter systems.

                  korralriff
                  Last edited by cetled; 01-31-2006, 11:40 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Aged Salt
                    Hi Josh, my impression of Prodibio & other copycat products[Ultravit, etc] is one of trying to hitch a ride on the coat-tails of the ZEOvit success method but these products will fall far short of the results that ZEOvit achieves without the special zeolites & their specific carbon sources.
                    I think Iwan has proved enough that Prodibio will not fall short of ZEOvit.

                    Originally posted by Aged Salt
                    Iwan's results are a result of his aquarist's skills, hours of weekly husbandry, & the zeo-components & supplements that he uses.
                    This I agree with to an extent. Iwan is obviously a master aquarist. But the results of his Prodibio bacteria + ZEO supp method are shining through. His corals are nice and light and the colors look similar to that of the very nice ZEOvit tanks I've seen pictures of. Take other master aquarists for example such as Steve Weast or Joe Burger and they have spectacular tanks but they don't have the light low nutrient colors that Iwan's corals have. I think Iwan's results are a combination between his husbandry skills/practices and the Prodibio bacteria.

                    Originally posted by Aged Salt
                    others in Europe have tried these products with a dubious outcome.
                    Not doubting you but I also would like to see links to these results. I would actually like to see links to any results from anyone else that has used Prodibio as Iwan is the only person I know of at this time but there has to be more out there.

                    Originally posted by mesocosm
                    Not quite ... Iwan's awesome system includes a phosphate absorber (ROWAPhos), and a silicate absorber (unspecified). Source Link: Iwan's Technical Info Page (German language reference to "phosphatabsorber" and "silikatabsorber").
                    In Iwan's thread on RC he stated that he only runs these absorbers when silicates are detectable or when PO4 rises above .02, IIRC. I know I've read posts about zeo tanks where if you feed a little more than normal your PO4's can rise a little. So I don't think Iwan't use of these absorbers when needed makes his tank much different than a ZEO tank.

                    Originally posted by Aged Salt
                    To me the "proof is in the pudding" in that I like to see practical results. While there are a multitude of beautiful, colorful ZEOvit reefs pictured across many reef forums, I've only seen one reef using the mixed method.
                    But isn't this similar to how ZEOvit became popular in the US. Sure there may have been a few ZEO tanks out there beforehand but wasn't Alexander's tank the "model" that the first US ZEOheads strived to match? Just like there has to be other Prodibio tanks out there but Iwan's results could be where the bar has been set that people want to match.



                    I think this will be an interesting discussion. Competition is what forces companies to make their products better. It looks like some people in the US have already ordered Prodibio to see if they can achieve the type of success that Iwan has achieved. Only time will tell...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      here is a new tank that uses prodibio
                      He has all the nice toys

                      t zimmer

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by cetled
                        here is a new tank that uses prodibio
                        He has all the nice toys

                        t zimmer
                        Alois is he not using a zeolite mixture also ?

                        G.Alexander

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          No question, Iwans tank is really nice. A general question, what is the thought of the people with the light coral colours ? What do you think makes them look so bright ?

                          Please remember, with just poor nutrients this is not possible.

                          G.Alexander

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            He is using zeolite. maybe also carbon,amino acids etc

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Aged Salt
                              Thnx. for your reply, Simon, on your theoretical comparisons. If you wish to do the laboratory anaylsis of the different products, please do so, & post the laboratory's results here. To me the "proof is in the pudding" in that I like to see practical results. It does seem interesting to me that your approach uses mixed products, namely ZeoStart2, PIF, AAHC & C-V with bio-bacteria, bio-food, & RowaPhos's iron-oxide P04-remover. I agree not all zeo-users will automatically have success with their reefs as there can be no control over system inadequaties[parameter swings, flow, lighting, etc.], but that can occur with whatever method one uses. While there are a multitude of beautiful, colorful ZEOvit reefs pictured across many reef forums, I've only seen one reef using the mixed method.

                              Simon, have you seen any other reefs, besides Iwan's, using straight bio-products or even mixed products? Thnx. Bob

                              Hi Bob - thanks for the answer and there is consensus that that zeo works for some not others, and no doubt prodi will work for some not others.

                              I guess that as my assumptions and questions re the ZB3 in my post above
                              have not been corrected they are an accurate understanding. Therefore:

                              1. There is no empirical evidence anyone has presented yet that the Prodi 2 in question are inferior in content the ZB2 in question;

                              2. Sorry I cant afford to have the lab work done and have no alegence or stake in either to motivate my better half to forgo a vacation to pay for it - hehe- but unless someone has - to be fair - I dont think any statements arround relative merits are founded;

                              3. It is not clear that zeolite adsobtion of NH3 is a superior methadology to letting the microbes do all the work right the way down the chain; Again I remain open to reasoning to the contrary.

                              4. Which leaves the possibility that shaking off biofilm into the water column may represent a coral feeding advantage - which could be achived using inert media.

                              What remains then for us to use in these forums is anecdotal experience - the proof in the pudding.

                              There are beautiful full Zeovit Reefs ballanced by some unhappy ZB4 users. ( I know of no unhappy CV AAHC PIF users)
                              With Prodi - there is Iwans ballanced by who were the 'others in Europe have tried these products with a dubious outcome' please?

                              Bob, no I havent come accross other tanks using the Prodi/zeo combo - which is why I'm spending a fair degree of effort on these forums attempting to draw out what knowledge and experience we can learn from .

                              More generally, I dont think we can say that Prodi is a copycat product of ZB4. The French, since Pasteur and Curie are world leaders in microbiology so its entilely possible that that company and Mr Phol have developed systems independly.

                              PROPOSAL:

                              I would like to propose a 'proof in the pudding' type experiment that may appeal to you Bob . I have said I will run with the methadology at the start of this thread for a year - then convert to full ZB4. Would anyone like to join me?

                              As a comparison group are there any ZB4 users who would be prepared to substitute ZB3 with Prodi 3 with the above methadology for a year?

                              We can agree the fine details of the hypothesis, controls, confounding factors and opt out circumstances if there are any takers.

                              We should exclude anyone who has a comercial interest in the outcomes.

                              Each group could have a mentor (who could have a comercial interest) to help achieve best results, and the mentors could swap groups at the turn arround point.

                              IMO such an approach would generate even more constructive interest.

                              Cheers

                              Simon
                              Last edited by trythechi; 02-01-2006, 08:07 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X