
I've been using zeovit from January this year and I've found it to be a very good method of reducing nutrients. It took however about 4 months for my system to show benefit of using zeo.
In August I have moved my reef into smaller tank with total water volume of around 150l. I use 0.5kg of zeo stones in zeo filter pumped clean 2 to 5 times a day. Water flow through zeo filter is around 600l/h. I dose 0.3ml of start2 a day and I add 1 drop of zeofood and 2 drops of zeoback twice a week. I also use 0.5 kg of activated carbon, skimmer Aqua Medic Turboflotor 1000 multi, Korallin Calcium reactor and 1x400w 20000k light. There is around 30-40kg of Live Rock in the tank, water movement is provided by Eheim 1260 (return from sump) + 3 Maxijet 1200. Stock include mandarin, small cling fish and 4 1cm gobies. I add just a pinch of artemia once every other day. No additional food is used.


Water parameters are: KH 10,2 Ca 430ppm, Mg 1200ppm, No3 30mg/l.
I don't understand why my no3 are so high!?!
In the same time the main tank which is FOWLR has No3 of 10mg/l. The bioload of this 180g tank is big: hawaiian, rectangular and picasso triggers, yellow and purple tang, maroon clown, blue spotted toby. There are 2 tunze steams, Turboflotor 5000twin, around 70kg of LR. I use 1kg of zeo stones and 0.5 kg of carbon and add only zeostart at 1ml a day. The fish get flakes in the morning and 3 cubes of frozen artemia in the evening.
How come that No3 in my FO tank much lower than in the reef??? Considering bioload and amount of food added to each system, I just can not figure it out.


Comment