Let me start out with, I agree with many that you can't put too large a skimmer on a reef tank. I also agree that some skimmers perform better than others and are easier to set up. With that said.....
I don't mean to stir up a lot of hard feelings, but I have a difficult time following some of the economic reasoning I read on a lot of lists about skimmer efficiencies being a driving concern in selection. Don't get me wrong, if one skimmer needs a large high head pump top drive the ejector system and another uses a much smaller pump...I agree pick the more efficient skimmer.
My modified ER 5-2 will fill the skimmer cup with black goop daily, like a lot of good skimmers do. Even the most efficient skimmer will slow down skimming once it has removed most of the organic waste. My skimmer stops heavy foam skimming within an hour after feeding and idles along pulling out organics in between feedings. My skimmer uses a Sedra 9000 pinwheeel pump...rated at 90 watts, actually pulls 60 watts because of the entrained air in the flow.
What I don't understand is selecting a skimmer mainly because it uses 20 watts less power, and it cost $2,000 more. It will take 50 years to justify the cost based on the energy savings, if ever. There are a half dozen good quality skimmer mfg's that may use a few more watts, but so what. The difference between a 40 watt skimmer and a 60 watt skimmer is not justification for spending an additional $2,000. Just spend $50 or $100 more and buy a larger skimmer to start. The engineering economics doesn't work spending $2,000 more. You could save twenty times the wattage and energy by simply selecting more efficient lighting and bulbs with higher PAR value.
Of course that doesn't take into account that the skimmer can also being work of art ,and the winners are those that die with the most toys:flame: Of course I could be wrong....
I don't mean to stir up a lot of hard feelings, but I have a difficult time following some of the economic reasoning I read on a lot of lists about skimmer efficiencies being a driving concern in selection. Don't get me wrong, if one skimmer needs a large high head pump top drive the ejector system and another uses a much smaller pump...I agree pick the more efficient skimmer.
My modified ER 5-2 will fill the skimmer cup with black goop daily, like a lot of good skimmers do. Even the most efficient skimmer will slow down skimming once it has removed most of the organic waste. My skimmer stops heavy foam skimming within an hour after feeding and idles along pulling out organics in between feedings. My skimmer uses a Sedra 9000 pinwheeel pump...rated at 90 watts, actually pulls 60 watts because of the entrained air in the flow.
What I don't understand is selecting a skimmer mainly because it uses 20 watts less power, and it cost $2,000 more. It will take 50 years to justify the cost based on the energy savings, if ever. There are a half dozen good quality skimmer mfg's that may use a few more watts, but so what. The difference between a 40 watt skimmer and a 60 watt skimmer is not justification for spending an additional $2,000. Just spend $50 or $100 more and buy a larger skimmer to start. The engineering economics doesn't work spending $2,000 more. You could save twenty times the wattage and energy by simply selecting more efficient lighting and bulbs with higher PAR value.
Of course that doesn't take into account that the skimmer can also being work of art ,and the winners are those that die with the most toys:flame: Of course I could be wrong....

Comment