Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Biofilm Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Biofilm Thread

    Greetings All !

    My fascination with biofilms continues ... ...


    The cover of the November/December 2005 American Scientist features a graphic of an E. coli biofilm ...



    ... cool, huh?

    The issue also contains a general article on biofilms ... Dr. Shimek makes comment of it in the November 2005 issue of RC's Reefkeeping.

    Biofilms
    A new understanding of these microbial communities is driving a revolution that may transform the science of microbiology.
    Joe J. Harrison, Raymond J. Turner, Lyrium L. R. Marques, Howard Ceri
    American Scientist, Vol. 93, Number 6, Page 508, 2005.
    Full Text Article

    From the article ...

    When we think about bacteria, most of us imagine a watery milieu, with
    single-celled organisms swimming about. We might envision these solitary entities getting together with some of their brethren now and then to cause some disease or spoil some food, but once the job is done they return to their isolated existence. This image of bacterial existence, it turns out, is not only oversimplified but perhaps misleading as well. In nature, the majority of microorganisms live together in large numbers, attached to a surface. Rather than living as lonely hermits in the so-called planktonic form, most bacteria spend much of their lives in the microbial equivalent of a gated community—a biofilm.
    And ...

    A mature biofilm is a fascinating construction: It can form layers, clumps and ridges, or even more complex microcolonies that are arranged into stalks or mushroom-like formations. The residents of the biofilm may be a single species or a diverse group of microorganisms distributed in various neighborhoods. Their common bond is a matrix made of polysaccharides, DNA and proteins, which together form an extracellular polymeric substance—what many microbiologists just call slime.
    And ...

    It's becoming increasingly clear that the communal life offers a microorganism
    considerable advantages. The physical proximity of other cells favors synergistic interactions, even between members of different species. These include the horizontal transfer of genetic material between microbes, the sharing of metabolic by-products, an increased tolerance to antimicrobials, shelter from changes in the environment and protection from the immune system of an infected host or from grazing predators. The formation of a biofilm has even been likened to the program by which cells within a multicellular organism differentiate.

    The article also presents some graphics which may be of interest ... ignore the zeovit.com overlay. It is NOT a copyright claim ... all of these images are copyrighted to American Scientist.



    Figure 2. Formation of a biofilm is analogous to the development of a multicellular organism, with intercellular signals regulating growth and differentiation. A typical biofilm forms (follow arrows from upper left) when free-swimming planktonic bacteria adsorb to a biotic or inanimate surface—an association that is initially reversible, but then irreversible. Adhesion triggers the first physiological changes on the path to a biofilm lifestyle. As the bacteria grow and divide, molecular signals passed between the cells provide information on cell density—a process called quorum sensing. In a maturing colony, the microbes produce an extracellular polymeric substance—a
    matrix of polysaccharides, DNA and proteins that encases the microcolony
    structure. Planktonic cells may leave the biofilm to establish new biofilm structures. Signals from the collective may also recruit new microbial species to join the consortium.
    Stephanie Freese
    And ...



    Figure 6. Biofilms derive their extraordinary tolerance to antimicrobial compounds from several factors. Bacteria near the center of a microcolony grow very slowly because they are exposed to lower concentrations of oxygen and nutrients (1). They are thus spared the effects of antibiotic drugs, which are much more effective against fast-growing cells. Intercellular signals (2) can alter the physiology of the biofilm, causing members to produce molecular pumps that expel antibiotics from the cells and allow the community to grow even in the presence of a drug. The biofilm matrix is negatively charged (3) and so binds to positively charged antimicrobials, preventing them from reaching the cells within the colony. Specialized populations of persister cells (4) do not grow in the presence of an
    antibiotic, but neither do they die. When the drug is removed, the persisters can give rise to a normal bacterial colony. This mechanism is believed to be responsible for recurrent infections in hospital settings. Finally, population diversity (5), genetic as well as physiological, acts as an "insurance policy," improving the chance that some cells will survive any challenge.
    Stephanie Freese

    BTW ... the American Scientist cover was done by:

    edm studio
    http://www.edmstudio.com/


    They did a presentation on their process of generating it ...

    edm studio design project:
    Visualization - Biofilm
    http://www.edmstudio.com/visualization/biofilm.html



    JMO
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
    Hunter S. Thompson

  • #2
    Greetings All !


    If you're interested in a general overview of biofilms, this might be useful to you ...

    Microbial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics
    Mary Ellen Davey and George A. O'toole
    Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, December 2000, p. 847-867, Vol. 64, No. 4

    From the summary ...

    "Biofilms are complex communities of microorganisms attached to surfaces or associated with interfaces. Despite the focus of modern microbiology research on pure culture, planktonic (free-swimming) bacteria, it is now widely recognized that most bacteria found in natural, clinical, and industrial settings persist in association with surfaces. Furthermore, these microbial communities are often composed of multiple species that interact with each other and their environment. The determination of biofilm architecture, particularly the spatial arrangement of microcolonies (clusters of cells) relative to one another, has profound implications for the function of these complex communities. ..."


    [ Hyper-Linked Table of Contents for the Article:]



    SUMMARY
    INTRODUCTION
    Complex Attached and Aggregated Communities
    Collective Behavior
    SURFACE-ATTACHED COMMUNITIES IN THE REAL WORLD
    Biofilm Structure
    Structure and Function Studies
    Plant-Associated Biofilms
    ECOLOGICAL ADVANTAGES: WHY MAKE A BIOFILM?
    Protection from the Environment
    Nutrient Availability and Metabolic Cooperativity
    Acquisition of New Genetic Traits
    ROLE OF SURFACE-ATTACHED BACTERIA IN DISEASE
    Bacterial Biofilm Infections
    Implant-Based Infections
    Biofilms and Pathogenesis
    GENETIC DISSECTION OF BIOFILM FORMATION
    Role of Environmental Signals
    Initiation of Biofilm Formation
    Maturation of the Biofilm
    Molecular Genetics of Oral Biofilms
    CONCLUSIONS
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    REFERENCES





    Full Text Article






    FYI


    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
    Hunter S. Thompson

    Comment


    • #3
      Greetings All !

      The above referenced article also included this ...



      FIG. 1. Ecology of microbial communities. Top-down view of an idealized surface-attached microbial community, illustrating some of the major concepts pertaining to the ecology of biofilms discussed in the text. The four microcolonies at the center of the figure represent organisms that both generate and consume hydrogen and comprise two organisms that participate in syntrophism (see text). Fermenting organisms produce organic acids used by the hydrogen producers, and these fermenting organisms gain their carbon and energy by utilizing various sugars. In addition to potential metabolic interactions between organisms, signaling molecules may aid in inter- and intraspecies communication. The factors described above (as well as environmental influences) may all contribute to the spatial organization of the biofilm. As shown here, microcolonies in natural communities can comprise either a single or multiple bacterial species. The proximity of different microbes allows the possibility of physical interactions in addition to communication via diffusible factors.


      Kind of cool ...


      It also had a little section on marine snow ... "mulm" ...

      "Another type of biofilm community that is being investigated is the bacterial assemblages associated with suspended particles of organic and inorganic material in the marine environment. Researchers have shown that these macroscopic particles, often referred to as marine snow, are enriched in microbial biomass, nutrients, and trace metals and are involved in biogeochemical transformation of particulate organic carbon in the pelagic environment ... ."

      And last, but not least, it also contained a link to some "cheesy" ... but oddly entertaining ... brief QuickTime movies of biofilm behavior ...

      Biofilms in Action (Dartmouth University).



      FYI
      "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
      Hunter S. Thompson

      Comment


      • #4
        Great stuff, Gary, thnx.--now I can understand "The Blob" in the sci-fi 1950's movie using chemoattraction. All we need now is a confocal microscope BTW, I lov the GFP biofilm cover pix Bob
        "There might be something to this ZEOvit"

        Comment


        • #5
          Greetings All !



          If you're interested in learning more about biofilms, Montana State University in Bozeman, Montana has produced this ...



          Biofilms: The HyperTextbook
          Introduction Page

          by Alfred B. Cunningham, Center for Biofilm Engineering & Rockford J. Ross, Department of Computer Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.

          (a hypertextbook project supported in part by the National Science Foundation, the Center for Biofilm Engineering, the Biofilm Institute and Montana State University)


          Great Stuff !
          Last edited by mesocosm; 04-21-2006, 07:20 PM. Reason: My brain is gone ... sorry MSU.
          "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
          Hunter S. Thompson

          Comment


          • #6
            Greetings All !



            There are several reasons why "pumping" the ZEOvit media in a ZEOreactor is part of Pohl's methodology. One of those reasons is to make sure that the biofilms formed from ZeoBak inoculation, in combination with pre-existing bacterial populations, have the opportunity to at least partially overcome "diffusion limitation" which results from the structure of biofilms.


            Much has been made over the last decade of the heterogeneous architecture of some biofilms (3, 36). These biofilms are described as clusters of microbial cells that are interspersed with water channels through which liquid flows. It is natural to wonder whether such conduits might ameliorate or even eliminate limitation of diffusive solute transport. Flow through water channels can improve solute transport in the immediate lining of the channel, but it does not assure access to the interior of cell clusters.

            Perhaps the best demonstration of this fact is the direct experimental measurement of oxygen penetration to the base of a biofilm in a void area but failure of the oxygen to penetrate in an adjacent cell cluster (8). Water may course through channels, but it does not percolate the cell clusters themselves. The dense aggregation of bacterial cells and their extracellular polymers within cell clusters precludes fluid flow. This means that water channels can expose the surfaces of clusters or channels but they do not allow free access of solutes to the interior of cell clusters.



            Figure 4-8. Flow through channels in a microbial biofilm. This movie follows the movement of fluorescently-tagged latex beads (small, bright spots) through channels and around cell clusters. Image credit: P. Stoodley


            Extracted from:
            Biofilms: The Hypertextbook
            Section 4: Do Water Channels in Biofilms Eliminate Diffusion Limitation?


            Last edited by G.Alexander; 11-26-2019, 06:26 AM.
            "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
            Hunter S. Thompson

            Comment


            • #7
              Greetings All !


              Reaction-diffusion phenomena create environmental microniches that allow for the coexistence of diverse species (3). Some examples of the rich ecology that is possible in biofilms are expounded on below.



              Figure 4-6. A contour map of oxygen concentrations around a biofilm cell cluster. This cross-sectional map was constructed based on several oxygen microsensor profiles of a small region of a biofilm. The substratum is at the bottom (depth = 0) and the bulk fluid containing oxygen at the top. The arrows indicate the direction of the local diffusive flux of oxygen. Reference: de Beer et al (1994) (8).



              There are now a few elegant studies in which chemical gradients measured by using microelectrodes have been related to the distribution of specific bacterial species by in situ hybridization to fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes (19, 20, 24, 27, 29). These studies confirm that distinct chemical niches exist at different depths in biofilms. They also make it possible to understand how metabolically diverse microorganisms coexist in the biofilm. In nitrifying biofilms, for example, ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria coexist in close association.




              Figure 4-7. Ammonia oxidizers appear as green, and nitrite oxidizers as red in this (CSLM) image from Schramm et al (1996), Applied Environmental Microbiology, 62:4641.

              Clusters of nitrite oxidizers crowd around distinct clusters of ammonia oxidizers (20, 29). Thus, is the metabolic waste product of the ammonia oxidizers, nitrite, made available to the bacteria that can use it as a substrate for oxidation. The activities of these commingled species lead to the consumption of ammonia and oxygen near the biofilm surface and the simultaneous production and consumption of nitrite slightly below the biofilm surface.

              Extracted from:
              Biofilms: The Hypertextbook
              Section 3: Why are biofilm chemistry and biology so spatially heterogenous?

              Attached Files
              Last edited by G.Alexander; 11-26-2019, 06:41 AM.
              "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
              Hunter S. Thompson

              Comment


              • #8
                Greetings All !


                Metamorphosis of a Scleractinian Coral in Response to Microbial Biofilms.
                Nicole S. Webster, Luke D. Smith, Andrew J. Heyward, Joy E. M. Watts, Richard I. Webb, Linda L. Blackall, and Andrew P. Negri
                Applied and Environmental Microbiology
                February 2004, p. 1213-1221, Vol. 70, No. 2


                Abstract

                Microorganisms have been reported to induce settlement and metamorphosis in a wide range of marine invertebrate species. However, the primary cue reported for metamorphosis of coral larvae is calcareous coralline algae (CCA). Herein we report the community structure of developing coral reef biofilms and the potential role they play in triggering the metamorphosis of a scleractinian coral. Two-week-old biofilms induced metamorphosis in less than 10% of larvae, whereas metamorphosis increased significantly on older biofilms, with a maximum of 41% occurring on 8-week-old microbial films. There was a significant influence of depth in 4- and 8-week biofilms, with greater levels of metamorphosis occurring in response to shallow-water communities. Importantly, larvae were found to settle and metamorphose in response to microbial biofilms lacking CCA from both shallow and deep treatments, indicating that microorganisms not associated with CCA may play a significant role in coral metamorphosis. A polyphasic approach consisting of scanning electron microscopy, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) revealed that coral reef biofilms were comprised of complex bacterial and microalgal communities which were distinct at each depth and time. Principal-component analysis of FISH data showed that the Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Cytophaga-Flavobacterium of Bacteroidetes had the largest influence on overall community composition. A low abundance of Archaea was detected in almost all biofilms, providing the first report of Archaea associated with coral reef biofilms. No differences in the relative densities of each subdivision of Proteobacteria were observed between slides that induced larval metamorphosis and those that did not. Comparative cluster analysis of bacterial DGGE patterns also revealed that there were clear age and depth distinctions in biofilm community structure; however, no difference was detected in banding profiles between biofilms which induced larval metamorphosis and those where no metamorphosis occurred. This investigation demonstrates that complex microbial communities can induce coral metamorphosis in the absence of CCA.

                Full Article (html)
                http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/...urcetype=HWCIT


                Just when you thought that all bacterial biofilms were good for was nutrient reduction and nutrient delivery ...
                Marine biofilms alone have been reported to induce the metamorphosis in several classes of cnidarians, including Anthozoa (hard and soft corals) (12, 26), Scyphozoa (jellyfish) (3), and Hydrozoa (20). The species composition of natural coral reef biofilms that play a role in coral metamorphosis have as yet not been determined.

                (From above referenced article)


                JMO
                "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
                Hunter S. Thompson

                Comment


                • #9
                  Greetings All !


                  For anyone wondering what happens to the biofilm on the inner glass surface of an aquarium when it is exposed to current ...



                  Shear induced detachment of a biofilm.


                  Movie Author: P. Stoodley
                  http://www.erc.montana.edu/Res-Lib99...02/02-M001.htm




                  Is this cool ... or what?
                  "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
                  Hunter S. Thompson

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X